The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people volunteering in various kinds of organizations, in 2008 and 2014.
Overall, while the volunteer participation in art, health care, sport, and environmental organizations increased in the given time, the opposite is true for other types of organizations. In addition, it is noteworthy that in both years, health care remained the least attractive area for volunteers.
In 2008, volunteering in the educational area stood at the top accounting for nearly a quarter of all volunteers. Environmental volunteers lagged behind educational organizations with 21% that was higher than 18% of people volunteering in art organizations. The figure for sport and other organizations is the same at 15% that is roughly twice as the proportion of the health care area.
After 6 years, the volunteer rate of both environmental and sports organizations experienced a significant increase and reached 21% and 29% respectively. In contrast, the figure for art, educational, and other organizations dropped to 12%, 17%, and 9% accordingly. A slight increase in volunteer participation can be seen in health care organization, however, it still held the lowest proportion of people volunteering, which was just 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- In many countries people are spending more time in the workplace Why is this Is this a negative or positive development 92
- New technologies have changed the way people spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, still, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59162303665 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56373401142 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7517162251 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209018561459 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968671288872 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748230870327 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153370142175 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786180779192 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.