The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the shares of British students who have proficiency to speak on other languages. The surveyed data represents the changes during a decade, from 2000 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is of note one third part of all university students in Britain have no ability to speak foreign languages, and by 2010 the proportion of them rose by 5%.
In 2000, French and other languages spoken students accounted for the equals shares, constituting 15 % of the total amount of students. But in a decade the percentages has experienced some moderate changes: the number of French spoken people has been increased by 5%, whereas students with knowledge of other prominent languages has kept a balance at 10% with pupils who do not have a talent for any foreign languages.
Turning to the remaining groups of students, it is apparent that rate of students spoken on two other languages except English was totaling approximately to German speaking students in the early 00s, hovering around 10%. When by the end of 2010 its quantity has surpassed the students with ability to speak in German, and that was 15% and 10 % respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | Anastasia0511 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with the projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The line graph shows the number of immigrants who obtained UK citizenship between 1962 and 2002 and the bar chart gives a breakdown of the number in 1996 and 2002 according to the continents they came from Summarize the information by selecting and report 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, third, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97948717949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75712565256 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9127438051 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234683921552 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1117258556 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388981456223 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14402375818 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300031745967 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.