The charts below show the proportions of british students at one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage breakdown of one university students in England that could speak languages other than English in 2000 and 2010. Overall, during the decade, a considerable proportion of students were able to speak Spanish, while the least portion of these students could speak German.
First of all, it can be seen from the charts that the rate of students who could not speak other language decreased to a half from 20% to 10% throughout the surveyed period. Similarly, students speaking French only as an additional language also shrank its share from 15% to 10%, whereas the portion of German only kept the share with 10% from 2000 to 2010.
By contrast, the percentage of students speaking Spanish only increased from 30% to 35%, which continually accounting for the most significant composition in the total. The same trend could also be viewed in the groups of students speaking another language and two other languages, with both of them increased by 5% between 2000 and 2010.
- The charts below show the proportions of british students at one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 89
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quarter of the year.( in percentayge) 56
- Some population believe that preserving natural environment is crucial. However, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment ? 61
- Car ownership 73
- Learning to play team sports is an important part of a child's education. Do you agree and disagree? Give reason for your answers and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5888683298 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577380952381 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 10.5303793326 43.030603864 24% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286721143825 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158067141928 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918296656697 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207216546017 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939378475096 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.