The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of other languages spoken at one university by British students during the year 2000 and 2010.
On a glance of the given chat, for the year 2000 around 30% of students spoke Spanish. German and French were the second highest spoken language accounting to 15% and German and two other languages at 10%. 20 % of the students spoke no other language other than English. During the year 2010, Spanish was the highest spoken language by students followed by another language at 20% and two other languages at 15%. French, German, no other languages accounted to 10% at the same year.
When comparing both the charts Spanish and another languages speakers have risen about 5% during the year 2010 when compared with 2000. French and German speakers have fallen by 5% during the year 2010 and followed by a 10% decrease in no other language speakers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | BlackDelta | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Adithya999 | 67 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The given flow chart shows the various sources of natural gas and the way it is distributed.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. are zoo helping or hunting our animals? should zoo,s be banned ? Do you agree or Disagree ? 55
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...tudents during the year 2000 and 2010. On a glance of the given chat, for the yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88157894737 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35910594006 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1514406787 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315059165885 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167479523292 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916800934255 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246357432105 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953545512497 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.