The charts show the information about the use of Internet in 5 countries in Europe in 2000
The bar chart compares the proportion of Internet users in 5 different European countries in the year 2000, while the pie chart illustrates the average money each person spends on buying online stuff.
It is clear that Sweden and the UK had the greatest percentages of people who had access to the Internet and also accounted for the largest amount of online shopping expenditure in 2020. By contrast, Spain ranked the lowest position in terms of both the ratio of Internet users and the expense for Internet shopping.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, the Internet users in Sweden made up for 35% of its population, followed by the U.K with 20%. Conversely, merely 5% of the Spain citizens had access to the Internet, which is half of the figure for France (10%) and one-third of the ratio of Germany (15%).
Regarding the online shopping expenditure, British people spent the biggest budget for purchasing online stuff at 87 euros, a slightly lower number of 76 euros was recorded as the expense of Swedish. Germany and France allocated similar amounts of money for Internet shopping, with 57 and 46 euros respectively, while only 10 euros were being paid by Spain’s people for purpose of shopping online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2021-11-04 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 79 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 11 | view |
- The charts show the information about the use of Internet in 5 countries in Europe in 2000 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 and 2010 84
- Men and women employed in full time jobs have to share evenly household chores and caring for children at home Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss about the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 73
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...5% of its population, followed by the U.K with 20%. Conversely, merely 5% of the ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, look, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55599842742 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.169455649 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136156444281 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070787555391 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626570132391 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992369490228 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668977588065 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.