The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrates the number of speed camera's in use for 4 years along with the the accidents and death percentage for the same year.
Overall, there was a sharp increase and decrease in death percentage for the year 2005. However the speed cameras numbers were close to 150.
Firstly the number of speed camera in Melbourne in the year was about 25 numbers, whereas the following year the numbers wrose to close to 50 in numbers. Likewise in the two years there was a drastic fluctuation in the accident percentage. In 2002 the percentage was in between 3 and 4, whereas in 2003 the percentage was slightly above 3. There was a fairly stable numbers in case of death which was at slightly below 1 percentage for 2002 and 2003.
Secondly, the highest camera in use was during 2005. Although the accident percentage wrose to almost 4 percentage in 2005, the trend for death was seen rising sharply until mid of 2005 following which reduced close to 1 percentage at 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-10 | Dwarakesh Suresh | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | ravitejacts | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 61
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The charts illustrates the number of speed cameras in use for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...d cameras in use for 4 years along with the the accidents and death percentage for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...d cameras in use for 4 years along with the the accidents and death percentage for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... in death percentage for the year 2005. However the speed cameras numbers were close to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...umbers wrose to close to 50 in numbers. Likewise in the two years there was a drastic fl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, likewise, second, secondly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5116817393 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476744186047 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7966769219 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110777995582 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628746737954 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594534017606 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996767989301 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673208433659 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.