Cinema attendance by age group
The line graph illustrates the percentage of people in four different age groups going to the cinema in Great Britain.
Overall, despite being rises in the percentages of people attending the cinema in four groups, the highest figure was recorded for those aged 15-24. All age groups maintain the same ranking after 16 years except for the 25 - 35 group.
Regarding categories with increasements, there was a significant rise in the percentage of cinema attendance in the 15 - 24 group, from over 15% in 1984 to 30% in 1989. After that, there was a fluctuation between 1989 and 1994, after reaching a peak of 58% in 1999 and decreasing to 55% in 2000. In contrast, the smallest proportion was the oldest group, starting at 0% in 1984. After soaring slightly to 1994 at 5%, there was a marginal increase to 15% in 2000.
Remaining those aged 7 - 14 and 25 - 35, inspite of starting at 2 different percentage numbers, they both end at over 30%. The share of moviegoers aged 7 - 14 rose negligibly between 1984 and 1989, after which it rose sharply in 1994 and then ended the period at roughly 33% in 2000. In the meantime, the 25 - 35 viewers percentages in 1984, 1989 and 1994 started at about 5%, 10% and 25% respectively, followed by slight fluctuation during the surveyed period, and after rising slightly in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | Zahid6400 | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | vuongthaolinh | 84 | view |
- Cinema attendance by age group 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Nowadays a lot of companies switch to open offices Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 89
- The maps below show the planned to the town of Peterford in a 20 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where revelant At least 150 words 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71304347826 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69487527952 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1900485195 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265855797041 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117597230961 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106100383376 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2093792722 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122021418319 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.