Comparison of energy production
The bar chart provides a comparison of the energy produced between 1995 and 2005.
From an overall perspective, it can be seen that with the exception of the data of petro, the figures for all surveyed types of energy enjoyed an upward trend. In addition, coal was produced the most in both years.
Looking at the chart for more details, in 1995, the percentage of coal was the highest, at 29.80%. The figures for gas, petrol, and nuclear were lower, at 29.63%, 29.27%, and 6.40%, respectively. However, the percentage of other types of energy accounted for the lowest number, at 4.90%.
For the rest of the chart, in 2005, the proportion of coal, which was the highest, saw an increase to 30.93%. The proportion of gas increased from 29.63% in 1995 to 30.31% in 2005. In opposite to coal and gas, petrol experienced a decrease in the proportion of energy production from 29.27% in 1995 to 19.55% in 2005. There was also an increase in the figures for nuclear and other types of energy, at 10,10%, and 9.10% in 2005, correspondingly. In addition, the figure for other types of energy in 2005 was twice the figure for it in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- Percentage of households with electrical appliances
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buy a ticket and go to the cinema In the near future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline Do you agree or disagree 61
- How sugar is produced from sugar cane
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...verall perspective, it can be seen that with the exception of the data of petro, the figures for all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57353842015 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7315877082 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6363636364 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138241889636 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621464520591 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830618076227 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10944804199 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840726955781 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.