Creative Children
Creative Children
Some people believe that technology made children less creative than the past. Others think that technology has made children more creative that the past. This issue is a controversial one, but from my standpoint a close examination reveals that technology has made children nowadays less creative than they were in the past. This is because of two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, technology prevents children from figuring out things by their own. Instead, they are nowadays busy with their computers, laptops, PlayStations, and so on. In fact, when people try to understand how things in their surroundings are built, they develop their mentalities. My own experience is a compiling example of this. Back in the days, when I was at the age of ten, I did not have a phone, and I was not exposed to any kind of technology. Thus, I was trying to figure out how things around me is created. Indeed, my teachers told me that I am the best in my class because I ask a lot of questions about the things that they were teaching me. During these days, I can clearly see the differences between children and I when I was child, and I realized that there were not creative due to the reason they are exposed to several devises that make them busy not to think about anything but their games and mobiles. Therefore, I believe that children during these days are not as clever as children was in the past because of the technology of these new generations.
Not only does technology prevent children from understanding things themselves, but it also decreases their ability to think. Needless to say, children need to build their mentalities from a low age, and this could not be possible without concerning how to raise their ability to understand everything. In addition, this is paramount in order to have better future. By way of example, a friend of mine was very clever, and he always got the highest marks in my class in any subject. In fact, all the teachers loved him, and I asked myself why he is austere? Until one day, I determined to ask him what he did in order to get high marks. Hence, he told me that he did not have a phone to be busy using it, and he is focusing on studying and only studying. Henceforth, I decided to be like him, so I gave my phone to my mother and told her that I do not need it anymore. Thus, my degrees has improved, and I became the best in my school in each subject.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above. I am off the opinion that in most cases technology has impacted children by making them less imaginative. This is because of it blocks them from understanding things without any help from anyone, and it reduces their ability to comprehend anything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-15 | MynameisAhmed | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, kind of, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.0 343% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 88.0 5.60731707317 1569% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 33.7804878049 237% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 965.302439024 236% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 497.0 196.424390244 253% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58350100604 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 3.73543355544 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63851367819 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 106.607317073 218% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466800804829 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 283.868780488 251% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 1.53170731707 1110% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 11.0 0.482926829268 2278% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 8.94146341463 280% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4486985824 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.12 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.88 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 3.70975609756 404% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257547464597 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809366343884 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14080601081 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157516464613 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117314921941 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.