Describe a chart on spreads consumption
The diagram shows the using amount of spreads namely margarine, low fat & reduced spreads and butter from 1981 until 2007. Unit measured by grams.
Overall, can be identified that there’re remarkable changes between the consumption of the 19th and the recent years. From the 1981, only butter and margarine used as spreads, then they quickly descended throughout the time and passed by low fat & reduced type which was a new spread introduced at the year 1996. Eventually all types of spreads consumptions tend to go down.
Butter at 1981 considered as “dominant” which account for the highest rate of use and most-used was in 1986 which such an impressive consumption rate up to 160 grams (highest in the chart). Similarly, low fat & reduced spread had a high accelerated increase started from 1996 and peek-period was at 2001 then begin to descend slowly after.
Margarine throughout the years remain mostly the same using level and take the neutral role mainly from 1981 and then quickly dropped from 2001 to the lowest on 2007. Also, a uniqueness can be seen here that between the 1991-1996 time period, low fat & reduced spread consumption was on par.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 44 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | karunarora | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | eyraen | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | eyraen | view |
- The threat of nuclear weapon maintain world peace Nuclear power provide clean and cheap energy The benefits of nuclear weapon outweigh the disadvantages To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Writing task 1 Weekend activities at Newton Swimming Pool and the proposed new timetable 76
- Describe a chart on spreads consumption 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed spread consumption was on par.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0829015544 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63043118788 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.599336646 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193203898918 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877615419072 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669829681246 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127398549213 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270569542915 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.