Describe the report people used to the main five five transportation methods for travelling, study or work in 2004 and 2009.
The two pie charts illustrate the information about people used to the main five patterns for travel one university, work or study in two years 2004 and 2009.
A quick look on graph is enough to make it clear that in the starting year individual were used more the car for travelling while, in the last year bus become to more popular as compared to other three transport methods the train, bicycle and walking.
To commence with, in initially year people were liked more to travelling by personal vehicles car, in the same year bus become to the second largest popular transport system and approximately 33% of people were used in daily routine, respectively. Surprisingly, in the next five years individual were preferred more the bus for travelling which accounted for 46% than that car showed to downward trend.
Moving further, the train and walking in both transport systems represented to equal famous nearly 4% and 6% in 2009. Finally, in 2004, they were used the bicycle at 9% whereas, the figure for the bicycle revealed to minor change which was only at 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | Har preet singh | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- The table charts given information of attendance in secondary school by pupils in three years 78
- The bar chart shows to the percentage of male and female teacher choosing the teaching in six different types of educational sector in the U.K in 2010. 78
- It is now possible for scientist and tourist to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...re liked more to travelling by personal vehicles car, in the same year bus become to the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83152173913 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55117170716 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7807309115 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271119478127 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135970507766 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980788891218 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174564948839 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104273709373 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.