The diagram below shows the Petersburg Art Museum before and after renovations.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two plans show some changes and alterations that were made to the Petersburg Art Museum before and after restoration. Overall ,as can be seen from diagrams, the basic layout of the Petersburg Art Museum has been modified and one new room has been added.
First of all, having looked at the plans, the most striking modification that took place is the merging of the Gallery 2: Modern Art and the Gallery 3: Sculpture and after renovation there was only room for Modern Art. The identical situation can be observed between Gallery 1: Ancient Art and the Classroom 2 where the area of Gallery 1 has been significantly increased. In addition to this, the Cafeteria, which is connected with converted Gallery 1, has been built and after restoration some space near the Museum has been utilized for the Outdoor Sculpture Area. Finally, during the process of renovation only the Lobby and the Classroom 1 have been unchanged.
- The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B However due to its impact on the environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians and motorists goverments should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of tra 84
- Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is more important than building houses To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The amount of sport shown on television every week has increased significantly and this is having impact on live sports events Do you think the benefits of having more televised sport are greater than the disadvantages 80
- New technologies have changes the way children spend their free time Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
- The map below shows the present and proposed facilities of a university and the pie charts compare the percentages of engineering and medical students 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...um before and after restoration. Overall ,as can be seen from diagrams, the basic ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90445859873 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60902480371 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6149679269 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171614046522 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912562847597 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639325116079 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149376284571 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469171932274 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.