The diagram below shows the possible connection between the burning of fuels like oil and coal and the death of fish and trees.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given illustration demonstrates the consequences of burning fossil fuels.
Overall, it is indicated in the graph that there are two sources of fuels that go through different stages and eventually result in the death of fish and trees. Furthermore, while fish is killed in one way, trees are vandalized in two ways.
Petrol contains oil that is consumed by cars, along with factories burning coal and oil for several purposes, discharge emissions out in the air. The emissions include sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide which are harmful. A part of them, afterward, is absorbed by the clouds. Once the chemical reactions in the clouds happen, acid rain will fall. The contaminated water drops into the lake and leads to the death of fish. The soil also absorbs the water and then becomes acidified. When the osmosis of the tree happens, the roots are poisoned.
Another part of the two mentioned gases stays in the atmosphere and then becomes air-borne gases. The leaves of trees will unconsciously use the gases for metabolism and finally become seriously damaged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-28 | lunaire_anne | 59 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people now have the freedom to work and live anywhere because of advances in communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64232885016 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2283519074 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.25 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127166543219 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380541772324 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374007472308 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655661965673 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361715960545 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.