The figure shows the results of a survey of 1000 adolescents in five different countries. The participants were asked at what age they believed certain rights and responsibilities should be granted to young people.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature.
The bar chart compares data on the different opinions regarding the age at which specific responsibilities and rights should be bestowed upon young people among a thousand teenagers in five different nations.
Overall, while the trend varies, it is important to note that the avarage age for the particular social status for Japan is highest and the youngest age of being held responsbile for criminal act belongs to the USA.
Japanese youngsters believe that the rights to get married and to vote should only be given to those aged from 23 and 20, respectively. For other countries, the trend of the age at which marriage rights are given should be equal or higher than that of voting rights is also observed, with the only exception to the pattern being Egypt. In Egypt, teenagers think that 16 is the lower limit for legal marriage whereas 17 is the acceptable age for voting.
As far as the age of criminal responsibility is concerned, Japanese adolescents the lower age limit is 18, which is also the highest mark of the five countries. In constrast, USA voters think the much lower 12 years of age mark is already appropriate. Surveyees from the UK, Mexico and Egypt believe that 16 year olds and 14 year olds should be tried in a court of law should they commit a crime.
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organisations in 2008 and 2014 92
- The figures five information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories 87
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75446428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62860767031 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549107142857 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.64075955 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240016099046 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109031624935 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666482123329 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148299700541 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613303656265 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.