The given line graph and pie charts illustrate the growth of the economy and how much money people spent on food and services between 1995 and 2010. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the figures for economic growth fluctuated and remained nearly unchanged over the given period of years, while food and housing are the most popular spending.
Looking at the line graph, the number just stood at nearly 0.1 percent in the year 1995. However, the level gradually rose and reach its peak of 4 percent in 2005. Between 2005 and 2010, a dramatic decline was seen in the figures by approximately 9 percent, which was also its lowest point; whereas, the level increased again and reach almost the same as the figure in the beginning.
Turning to the pie charts, people had a high tendency to use their money on food and housing from 1995 to 2010, with roughly 60 percent for both. Other retailers had almost the same figures during the period and accounted for nearly 23 percent. Similarly, people just spend a little money on clothing, entertainment, and travel, with just approximately 17 percent of the total between 1995 and 2010. However, in the year that the economic growth reached its peak, people are more likely to spend their money on less essential services than in other years.
- The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories 91
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78923766816 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33745443105 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4258315591 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081087232613 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358988900708 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369694920463 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619548847161 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263782813029 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.