The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The first chart illustrates the monthly expenditure on children’s sports by British parents and the second chart compares the young participants in three sports between 2008 and 2014.
Overall, there was an increase in spending on children’s sports while football was considered as the most popular sport chosen by youth.
Viewing on the first chart, the amount of money was spent on children’s sport started at approximately 20 pounds in 2008, with an increasing rate at 2.5 pounds per year, which ended up at more than 30 pounds in the last year. On the participating in sports side, football always had the highest number of participants, which was at around 8 million children over 6 years included a slight downtrend in 2010. There was a gradual increase of children interested in swimming from 2.4 million in 2008 to 4.5 million in 2014. Athletic which had the lowest participation among the three sports till 2011 and surprisingly reach a peak of 5 million in 2012.
By the end of 2014, the number of participation in athletic was just under 5 million and outweigh the participation in swimming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selectin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n three sports between 2008 and 2014. Overall, there was an increase in spendi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06989247312 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06646325616 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3109010171 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362699035745 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180933427677 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139604450035 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247701076068 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162047180371 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.