The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line graph illustrates details of the average monthly spend on student's games by the parents of British citizens. The second line graph gives the number of children participating in football, athletics, and swimming. The number of children is measured in millions and money is measured in pounds. Both graph shows between 2008 to 2014.
Overall, the money spent by British parents on children's sport is gradually increasing as the year progressed. Most of the children participated in football. Swimming, the participation of children is stagnant while athletics is fluctuated.
On the one hand, the average monthly spend on children's sport started with 20 pounds in the year 2008 but gradually increased as the year progressed until it rose around 33 pounds in 2014.
On the other hand, football holds the highest number of participated students in 2008 with nearest to 8 million and then slightly diminished in 2010 around 7.8 million. In 2014 football holds nearly 9 million children. The number of participation of children in swimming is gradually increased from 2008(about 2.8 million) to 2014(around 3 million) where athletics fluctuated more between 2008 to 2014. In 2008 the number of children participated around 1 million and then its steady rose till 2012 with 5 million and then slightly decreased in 2014 with 4.8 million.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?Write at least 250 words. 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Otherpeople think hat in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology aremore important than History 73
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g in football, athletics, and swimming. The number of children is measured in milli...
^^^
Line 13, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly increased from 2008about 2.8 million to 2014around 3 million where athletics ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84738186973 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479262672811 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8300508071 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0833333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285098616647 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132067504755 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510665144954 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190990266368 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709504250878 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.