The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The following table illustrates how many UK residents made a visit of foreign countries and what their purpose was during 1994 to 1998, with the second table depicting which destinations were more popular among 100000 sampled individuals in the same course.
As can be clearly observed from the first table, a cross-section of 100000 people was surveyed. The majority of sampled individuals traveled abroad because of holiday. Unlike a slight decline in 1995, it experienced a remarkable increase from 15246 on 1994 to 20700 people of 1998. Followed by business aims, it was 3155 in 1994 and rose considerably to 3957 in 1998. Visiting friends and relatives was placed at the third rank which there was a slight rise from 2689 in 1994 to 3181 of 1998. Around 1000 people answered they traveled overseas due to other reasons and it fluctuated around 1000 between 1994 to 1998.
Turning to the second table, the most popular region which UK residents tended to travel there was Western Europe. Although it witnessed a slight fall from 19371 in 1994 to 18944 in 1995, it went up significantly to 24510 at the end year of 1998. Around 1000 or so individuals were interested in North America between 1994 till 1996, while it virtually became doubled in 1998 in comparison with 1994 which were 1823 and 919, respectively. Other areas attracted 1782 people in 1994 and increased steadily to around 2486 of 1998.
Overall, it is clear from the tables that the maximum number of people were questioned in 1998 which was equivalent to 28828. Followed by 27447 of 1997, 24949 individuals of 1996, 22072 in 1994, and 21610 people of 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-11 | sattar_iust | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | vungochuyen25 | 73 | view |
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries What is your opinion 77
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 77
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8916967509 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58067450087 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8916429814 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166794273558 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680218353704 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390034802769 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106732602459 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352986341713 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.