The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The first line chart illustrates the number of train kilometers between 2000 to 2009 and the second line chart describes the proportion of trains making on time compared with the aim in the same period.
Overall, There was a fluctuation in the number of train passengers while there was a rise in the percentage that trains running on time and always running on time in the last 2 years.
First of all, over 35 millions kilometers of trains which went in 2000 then increased moderately to over 40 millions in 2 years later. This figure of train distance witnessed a huge change that fall to bottom at 36 millions in 2003 before reaching the peak at more than 45 millions in 2005. Secondly, The figure for the distance of trains decreased gradually to nearly 40 millions then remained stable around this number until 2009.
Finally, the target percentage was 95% from 2000 to 2009, while the proportion of train that make it in time in the first year was lower by 3% then increased sharply to overcome the target, which higher by 2% in 2004. However, there was a significant decline of trains running in time percentage to 92% in 2 years later but rose back to 97% then unchaged it in the period 2008 to 2009.
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 73
- In some countries the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- The chart below gives information about UK Immigration Emigration and net migration between 1999 to 2008
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58525345622 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44528131496 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.6890436315 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4639738766 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212555413288 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110111610721 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290546026899 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891476877267 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.