The given line graph depicts the demand of various kinds of fast food in Britain. The fast food categories are divided into three groups including hamburger, fish and chips and pizza. Overall, it is obvious that pizza consumption was the most popular category in 1970, while fish and chips were a major demand in 1990.
According to the graphs, hamburger and fish and chips consumption had a similar trend. In the beginning of given period, hamburger and fish and chips were sold approximately 30 grams and 90 grams, respectively. After that, there was a negligible increase of hamburger’s demand during 1970 and 1985, while this rise happened with fish and chips consumption between 1970 and 1980. In the following years, for hamburger, its consumption rose substantially and reached just under 300 grams. In addition, there was a considerably growth of fish and chips demand with 500 grams in 1990.
On the other hand, the consumption of pizza had a downward trend. Pizza was sold 300 grams in 1970. After that, the consumption decreased moderately during 1970 and 1985 and then it rose slightly with the figure was just above 200 grams in 1990.
To conclude, it can be seen that hamburger and fish and chips were more and more popular, however, pizza was less consumed in Britain.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 73
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are reasons for these behaviors What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 84
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set 61
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extend do you agree or disagree with 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...under 300 grams. In addition, there was a considerably growth of fish and chips demand with 500 grams...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99078341014 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62154877846 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0288271928 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183697320854 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079634811029 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553631575995 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116408735226 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081938328243 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.