Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Spending money on the railways should be prioritized instead of roads by the government. I partially agree with this statement because, it is important to improve railways since it is cheaper and easily accessible for people. However, roads are very important when it comes to logistics which uses roads for transport.
Nowadays, people-mostly youngsters are involved in political issues and vocaling out their opinion. In other words, as a citizen, we should give some thought in the annual budget government makes. It is important and essential to improve the railway system which can improve the comfort of the passengers since it is one of the most used public transports. If some of these improvements are implied, citizens can be benefited in many ways. For example, senior citizens usually get body fatigue from traveling long distance. However, by improving the seating configuration and material used in seats it can help them to reduce those kinds of fatigue. So, it is important to improve railways but, is it the most important investment that government have to take?
It is also important to develop the roadways simultaneously because, it can be useful in many different ways. For instance, most logistics use roads for transporting goods between states. In fact, it is reported recently that, more accidents are happening due to poor maintenance of roads. If those roads are maintained well enough those accidents would not have happened and those lives could have been saved. Moreover, people who uses roads in their day-to-day life can benefit from this as well.
In conclusion, I think government should be balanced in the developments they make. Ignoring a certain area and developing other areas can lead to serious issues. In my opinion, both roads and railways have to be developed and should be given equal importance.
- Some people marry shortly after finishing college Others prefer to focus on their careers first and wait until later to get married Which of these situations do you think is better 77
- The graph shows the percentage of males and females academic staff members across the faculties of a major university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 61
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about deforestation 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about TED 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ltaneously because, it can be useful in many different ways. For instance, most logistics use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 299.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82187055595 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 283.868780488 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4412778318 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3888888889 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167376637701 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565989098377 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696732759464 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120929267426 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922343208944 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.