The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph provides statistics regarding water consumption throughout the world in different fields as agricultural, industrial and domestic, whereas the table illustrates data of water utilization in Brazil and Congo for various purposes.
In general, water consumption around the globe had an increasing trend where agricultural purpose outshines the other sectors with an escalating difference. Likewise, water utilized by Brazilian had significant difference than Congo.
Industrial and domestic sectors had a minimal difference in terms of water consumption until the year 1950, after which the demand for industries rose dramatically to around 1000 km3. Local consumption, on the contrary, occupied only around 2000 km3. Similarly, starting with approximately 5000 km3 of water use in the year 1900, the agricultural sector had a steady increase in demand until mid-1940. Later, the utilization rose drastically to around 3000 km3 in the year 2000.
In Brazil, with 176 million population, 359 m3 water was consumed by each individual and about 26500km3 of it was utilized in irrigation purpose which when compared to Congo is more than 26 times greater. Congo holding a population of 5.2 million had 8m3 of water consumption per person.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree and disagree. 56
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 72
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and shows two possible sites for a new supermarket. 78
- Arts including art music and theatre are considered to be important in society Do you think the arts still have a place amongst our modern lifestyle Should the art be included in the school programs 70
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60209424084 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03529487762 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3532576333 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238832336701 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101350651459 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705749735884 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156664205807 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526837650941 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.