The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line chart reveals some noticeable similarities and differences between the birth rates of China and the US from 1920 to 2000. It can clearly be seen that both countries' fertility rates experienced lows during the 1940s and highs in 1950 before suffered a steady decrease until the end of the century.
Fluctuating between 11 and 13 percent for the period 1920 - 1940, birth rate in the US plunged to less than 5% in 1945 then surged to reach a peak of 15% in 1950. After that, there was a gradual decline in fertility rate to a mere 7% in 2000.
Likewise, but more wildly, Chinese birth rate saw irregular fluctuation from 10 to 15% prior to 1935 before suddenly keeping itself at the lowest level of 5% for the period of 5 years from 1940. This number also reached an immediate peak of 20% in 1950, then continued its weird trend when slumping to approximately 9% in 1955. The latter half of the century, however, saw a moderate fall to somewhere in the vicinity of 3% in this figure.
It is striking to see that despite the same downward trend eventually, fluctuation in birth rate of China was wider than that of the US. Nevertheless, the indicator from the North American country was still higher than the Asian counterpart after 1950.
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... 2000. It can clearly be seen that both countries fertility rates experienced lows during...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65470852018 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54675664086 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614349775785 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9814762826 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119385720114 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515171853888 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528572788435 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790991660289 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359855591741 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.