The graph below giives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

Essay topics:

The graph below giives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given line chart illustrates the percentage of the population, categorised in 4 different countries, namely Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia, from 1970, in ten-year intervals.

Overall, 4 cities had a tendency to be upward. It is also worth pointing out that the population in Malaysia will be estimated to become a city overcrowded in 2040.

To begin with, the percentages of population in Malaysia stood at roughly 30%, which was higher than that of Indonesia by about 2 times. In the next 2 decades, it is reported that population in both countries (Malaysia and Indonesia) witnessed a slight go up, reaching a peak (at around 46% and 20%,respectively). Up to now, the proportions of overcrowded in Malaysia and Indonesia have experienced a dramatical increase (at nearly 77% and 50%, accordingly). In the future, it is foreseen that the figure for Malaysia will become most population and Indonesia will turn to be the second overcrowded country.

Turning to the other set of data, there were about 31% of population in Philippines, which was higher than that of Thailand by approximately 10%. Until now, the figure for population in Malaysia have inclined minimally, despite a significant rise in 1990. Meanwhile, the figure for overcrowded in Thailand have inclined slightly and remained the same point until 2023. Moreover, both countries are predicted to rise minimally in 2040.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-07 hahoaan 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user giaminhonha :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, moreover, second, so, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26222222222 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15524255099 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537777777778 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8541044601 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141918769639 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059752629939 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326308444014 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855413388244 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119026470859 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.