The graph gives details regarding consumption of energy in the USA from 1980 to 2050.
35 Quadrillion units of Petrol and Oil was consumed in 1980, with slight fluctuation increased to 40 quadrillion in 2000 and reached the peak of around 43 quadrillion units in 2015, furthermore, predicted to increase to 50 quadrillion units by 2030.
Coal and Natural gas consumption was 20 and around 16 quadrillion respectively in 1980 eventually both reached to 17 quadrillion units in 1990 thereby, consumption of coal rose gradually to around 23 quadrillion units in 2016 and predicted to reach around 30 quadrillion units by 2030. On the other hand, natural gas consumption decreased to around 20 quadrillion units in 2010 and reached 23 quadrillion units in 2015 assumed to remain constant till 2030.
Nuclear, solar / wind and hydro power consumption was around 3 quadrillion units in 1980, with slight inclination in nuclear use of around 7 quadrillion units in 2005 which remained same until 2015. However, solar / wind use fell down further to 2 quadrillion units in 2015, whereas, hydro power use was around 1 quadrillion units in 2015. Nuclear, solar / wind and hydrogen consumption is predicted to be around 6, 5 and 1 quadrillion units respectively by 2030.
To sum up, consumption of Petrol and Oil in USA will be the highest of all other fuels.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 61
- Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too clostly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.To what extent do you agree? 92
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 95
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 78
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290322580645 0.268076937826 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.104838709677 0.116061578633 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0524193548387 0.0759168565197 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0403225806452 0.0366838410393 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.149193548387 0.155750635184 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0120967741935 0.0379272487307 32% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.01371817438 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0483870967742 0.0210936926555 229% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00403225806452 0.00175180941692 230% => OK
Determiners: 0.0282258064516 0.0948980150116 30% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00403225806452 0.00437022459523 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00403225806452 0.00967000014798 42% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1356.0 1161.00487805 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.9 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97356828194 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73763899035 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.312775330396 0.337110787985 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242290748899 0.247514529752 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198237885463 0.171178102325 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154185022026 0.112407865282 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01371817438 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449339207048 0.546246751206 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.4389613833 49.3433353143 80% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 28.375 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3802557395 42.9750493124 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.5 135.714022679 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.689975730869 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 52.6040748899 47.7609492067 110% => OK
Elegance: 3.11111111111 2.94281807926 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230386464986 0.418131533498 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.315119751866 0.181151798455 174% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.139239078584 0.0850326197045 164% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.872164480803 0.706616315825 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138555668947 0.157042692854 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169511532647 0.228904883108 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107885936392 0.108899403657 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37591434566 0.367819155151 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.205973805221 0.0812612215331 253% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215181445763 0.316326947829 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10870761805 0.0921553760075 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.