The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
The line graphs elucidate the number of tourists travelling in five countries namely; Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and the US. The units are measured in millions of people.
In 1995, the most common place to visit was the US, which is recorded at 70 travellers. Meanwhile, France got the next highest international visitors of 30; Malaysia is followed closely at 20 whereas the least countries were Brazil and Egypt at 70 tourists. Between 1995 and 2005, there was a drastic increase in the number of tourists visiting France at nearly 20. By the end of the period, there was another drastic rise for France to reach the point where it has the equal number of visitors for the US (90). Tourists visiting Malaysia move up steadily over the whole period but by 2010, the number was still lower than 50 people. The number of tourists going to Brazil and Egypt was similar for the period between 1995 and 2000 but after that, there was a greater increase travellers to visit in Egypt than to Brazil.
The overall number of tourists arrival amongst five countries has increased. It is apparent that, the US and France were the popular countries to travel in 2010 whereas Brazil was the least.
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 70
- The diagram below shows the changes in that area of Mary farmland in England from 1960 to 2000. 60
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 207 200
No. of Characters: 957 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.793 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.623 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.323 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.471 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.436 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.152 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4