The provided graph outline number of international visitors in millions in Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and USA from 1995 to 2010. From the illustration is seen that all countries had overall increasing number of arrivals over the period.
Egypt and Brazil had showed almost same numbers and slow increasing trend form beginning almost ten million in 1995 to about fifth-teen millions at the end of the period in 2010.
Malaysia and USA began with about 20 millions and slightly above 70 millions in 1995. Both countries had a growing steady trend without significant fluctuations, finished in 2010 with just over 40 millions and about 85 millions respectively.
Over one and half decade the most international visitors arrived to France. In five years period from 1995 to 2000, number of international visitors doubled from beginning 30 millions to about 60 millions. With steady raise number of international tourists reached same number as USA (about 85 millions).
From the graph is obvious, that international tourism is popular and showed increasing trend in all compared countries.
- Some people think that it is more important to build new houses than to plant trees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- What are the causes of water scarcity? What are your solutions? 89
- The pie charts compare the percentage of carbohydrates, protein and fat with three different diet programs. 56
- 1. Millions of people every year move to English speaking countries such as Australia, Britain, or America in order to study at school, college or university. Why do some people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international lang 78
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers, while others prefer local markets. What are the advantages of each? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32369942197 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85353657555 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3297870334 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181423198696 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883690644609 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469391615807 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108474226243 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663677499094 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.