The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009
The line graph illustrate the different of networkes for three kinds of state between 1999 to 2009.
Overall, at the beginning of the period Mexico fragment contributed the least to the internet users between three countries, while USA was the most significant part. In comparison, at the end of the period Canada became the largest contribution and the most negative trend was remains of Mexico segment.
In 1999, Mexico and Canada section accounted for the first and secondly smallest part and Canada had experienced to increase dramatically more and more to the end of time, which became the most popular. Unlikely, Mexico only increased gradually and became most inpopular in 2009 than other countries.
On the other denomination, USA which the most huge trend in 1999, whilst not normally way and became the second part of extensive internet users in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | tieuchanchau01230 | view | |
| 2022-02-06 | luckydough55 | 52 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Ester Nguyễn | 70 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | Manvir singh | view | |
| 2020-08-24 | anvyylad | view |
- The chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh than disadvantages. 67
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'secondly the smallest'.
Suggestion: secondly the smallest
...ada section accounted for the first and secondly smallest part and Canada had experienced to incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12413793103 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63890223276 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2055842341 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174451777142 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10090614201 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901426730601 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129704630945 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822585941843 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.