The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
The graph displays the number of people living in four cities in the world between 1970 and the present.
On the whole, the population of these cities grew a lot since 1970. The number of residents in Malaysia and Indonesia has risen the most, while the number in the Philippines has increased too.
In Malaysia, the number of residents pushed up from about 30% in 1970 to 40% in 1980. But following this the population has grown rapidly from 40% in 1980 to 80% at the present time. Likewise, the number of people living in Indonesia also soared from a little more than 10% to about 60% at the present time.
In addition, the Philippines increased sharply from 30% in 1970 to almost 50% in 1990. However, it fell sharply from almost 50% in 1990 to about 40% in 2010. Since then, it has increased slightly by 50% through 2040. Finally, Thailand has risen steadily over the years. Although from 1990 to 2020, there has only been a slight increase, in general, Thailand has increased steadily until the present time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 67
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- More and more measures to improve the security in the large area in the urban areas have been introduced because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweighs the drawbacks 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, likewise, so, then, while, in addition, in general, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68333333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34585923609 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8140212489 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6363636364 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152703861457 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645041295661 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452586868952 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103538364336 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387670717104 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.