The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph compares the amount of money spent on buying books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria over a period of ten years between 1995 and 2005.
In 1995 Austria spent the least amount of money on books, while Italy and France spent about as much as each other. However, by 2001, the gap in spending between these two countries had widened and considerably more money was spent in France than In Italy.
As can be seen from the graph, the amount of money spent increased in all four countries but rose the most dramatically in Austria. The period between 2000 and 2005 saw a sharp growth and in 2005 the Austrians spent three times as much money as they did in 1995.
However, during this ten-year period, Germany remained the biggest spenders on book, with all three other countries spending much less on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | sushiluon | view | |
| 2023-06-06 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | khanhlyly | 78 | view |
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources on fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 78
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that they should spend money they earn now enjoying life while others think that the money should be put into savings for future Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 684.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68493150685 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15330091317 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.92569588 43.030603864 28% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470482679862 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243709247378 0.103423049105 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178019648164 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301716461026 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199034511114 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.