The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart demonstrates per capita figures of CO2 emission in four countries, which include United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between four decades spanning 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there were general increases of CO2 emissions per individual in Italy and Portugal, while the downwards trends can be observed in United Kingdom and in Sweden between the forty years.
The highest increase was in Portugal, which saw a rise of 4 metric tonnes, from around 1 to 5 metric tonnes during these four decades. Started from approximately 4 metric tonnes in 1997, the emission In Italy almost climbed to 8 metric tonnes in 1997, when a plateau happened.
Although United Kingdom’s emission was always the highest in each decade, a relatively steady decrease was represented, from 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to 9 tonnes in 2007. On the contrary, the emission in Sweden was unstable. The figure was 9 metric tonnes per head in 1967, reached a peak at over 10 metric tonnes in the next decade, and then dramatically drop to 5 metric tonnes in the next three decades.
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 89
- In some countries, the average weight of children is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing.What are the causes of these problems?What measures could be taken to solve them? 73
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99444444444 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67680364946 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8980705008 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161131706074 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934589323527 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762396087641 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127528505003 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796533472906 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.