The graph compares the average utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) per person in the countries of United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal over the years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is noticeable that UK is dominant in the usage of carbon dioxide for all the time period covered in question, despite the gradual decline afterward. Moreover, what stands out of graph is that there is an upward trend for the countries of Portugal and Italy. The quantities are measured in metric tonnes.
Although experienced steady usage between the years of 1967 and 1977, the average amount of carbon dioxide emission decreased slightly from just above 10 to over 8 starting from 1967 to 2007. Having reached peak at marginally over 10 in 1977, mean consumption of gas per person went down dramatically to under 8 between the years 1977 and1987, following this, for the remaining 20 years, gradual drop was experienced by Sweden by hitting its lowest point under 6 in 2007.
Additionally, starting at negligible over 4 in 1967, Italy hit high of carbon dioxide utilization at just below 8 in 1997 and then levelled off. Despite started at under 2 in 1967, the usage of carbon dioxide was expanded to slightly under 6 in 2007 in Portugal.
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development. However, others think the social value is lost as a result of economic development. To what extent do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh its disadva 84
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away. 89
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89523809524 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60752443392 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0195282707 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270373797827 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120507886381 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110404502936 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187807984044 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118217278824 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.