the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given linear graph compares the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) which were released per person in four European countries over a period of 40 years.
It is clear that the United Kingdom emitted by far the largest amount of CO2 than the others. In addition, while the UK's and Sweden's trends of producing CO2 decreased during this period, Portugal's and Italy's patterns increased.
In 1967, the UK's nations released a massive amount of CO2 (about 11 metric tonnes). This is followed by Sweden, with 9 metric tonnes approximately. Italy and Portugal were on the third and fourth rank, with just over 4 metric tonnes and nearly 1 metric tonne respectively.
Although the United Kingdom was on the top producer of CO2 all time, its trend fell moderately to 9 metric tonnes. Furthermore, whereas Sweden saw a radical improve to peak at just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977, it dived exponentially to about 7 metric tonnes in 1987 and then experienced a consistent decline to well under 6 metric tonnes. Like Italy's, Portugal's emitted CO2 grew gradually with some periodic fluctuation.
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.discuss both these views and give your o 73
- living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause social problems, as well as practical problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 81
- Some people claim that not enough of the wastes from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a large requirement. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, then, third, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98901098901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64762198694 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0372903065 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158356822208 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690648147538 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397509417682 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107054617192 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403962669101 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.