The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017.
The line graph gives compares three types of visitors to New Zealand between 1997 and 2017 in terms of the amount of money that people spent on a daily basis.
It is clear that the average spending on three types of visitors from 2000 to 2003. The money spent by people who visit for business purpose is the highest most of the time but it also fluctuates the most among all groups. As the spending for those visiting friends or relatives is consistently the lowest.
In 1997, business visitors spent about $260 daily while holidaymakers spent $190 and people visiting friends or families spent only $120, which is also the lowest figure ever. The average spending for these three groups all dramatically increased over the next 3 year, arriving at the peak in 2002 and 2003. At the time, the average spending for business visitors, holiday seekers and people visiting families is $330, $260 and $220, respectively.
After the peak, the amount of money spent on all groups plummet and the money spent on business visitors dropped the most, with a figure of $180 a day only. Despite the sharp decrease, it was still not the lowest number for business visitors, which was the $150 appeared in 2015. As for the people taking a vacation and people visiting friends, the change followed a similar trend, but the figure for holidaymakers eventually picked up and that for those visiting friends stayed relatively low. Finally, in 2007, the number was $250 for people having holidays, the most average amount of money spent during the year, $210 for business visitors and $140 for those visiting friends or relatives.
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 67
- In most parts of the world people are living longer What are the possible causes of this situation Is this a negative or positive development 92
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Today more people are overweight than ever before What in your opinion are the primary causes of this What measures can be taken to overcome this epidemic 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4219492184 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469090909091 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6847824951 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166754650261 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883953819188 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103803493748 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154402767932 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101816831309 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.