The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The provided graph reveals the information regarding the average amount of UK daily travellers by three means of transport over the 60 years period from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, most people in the UK have a preference for commuting by cars throughout the given timescale. It is also of note that while the considerable increase was seen in the number of those using cars and trains, that number of bus was experienced a downward trend.
In 1970, there was just more than 2 million people travelling by train, which was merely a half of the data of bus users and 5 million was the number of those commuting by cars. The figure of rail passengers went up to 3 million in the next 30 years and had a plateau until 2010. Likewise, a similar pattern was witnessed in the number of UK citizens using cars, which significantly increased to 7 million and also remained unchanged in the next 10 years. Noticeably, the reverse was true for bus commuters, which underwent a mild drop of around 0.5 million.
By 2030, it is predicted that the date of car users on a daily basis will reach the record high of 9 million, and the figure for train will experience a twofold growth compared to the initial statistic, to nearly 5 million. Contrary to those groups, bus users is foreseen to decline until 2030 become the less popular choice with only 3 million - a third of the car’s number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | WIWI UMAR | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 89
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 11
- Many people are afraid of leaving house because of crime. Some think more action should be taken to prevent crime, but others think little can be done. What is your view? 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Many people are afraid of leaving house because of crime. Some think more action should be taken to prevent crime, but others think little can be done. What is your view? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69105691057 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59770790273 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.6204212216 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.222222222 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250853886903 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101258348463 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600863649466 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157643450812 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334021162844 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.