The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph compares figures for daily travel by workers in the UK using three different forms of transport over a period of 60 years.
It is clear that car is by far the most popular means of transport for UK commuters throughout the period shown. Also, while the numbers of people who use car will grow remarkably, an even faster growth rate may be recorded for train passengers. The figure for bus users is, however, expected to fall steadily.
In 1970, around 5 million UK commuters travelled by car on a daily basis, while the bus and train were used by about 4 million and 2 million people respectively. In the year 2000, the number of those driving to work rose to 7 million and the number of commuting rail passengers reached 2 million before a plateau till 2010. By contrast, there was a small drop of approximately 0.5 million in the number of bus users.
By 2030, significant more computers will drive to work, reaching almost 9 million of them, and the figure for train users is also predicted to observe a twofold growth (compared with the initial figure), to nearly 5 million. On the contrary, buses are predicted to become the least popular choice, with only 3 million daily users, a decline of around one thousand travelers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | WIWI UMAR | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | hoang ngoc my | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
- Many people are afraid of leaving house because of crime. Some think more action should be taken to prevent crime, but others think little can be done. What is your view? 84
- The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed (on time or late), failed to write, and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 89
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Many people are afraid of leaving house because of crime. Some think more action should be taken to prevent crime, but others think little can be done. What is your view? 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71363636364 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54699223035 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8485705713 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209365819765 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885179219972 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561340114727 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120007997532 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060771031351 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.