The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The line graph represents the quantity of different types of food consumed by Chinese people in grams per person in a week from 1985 to 2010.
Overall, the fish consumption increased substantially compared to the decreasing the salt consumption, whereas meat consumption showed a slow growth in its consumption.
Looking at the detail, 600 grams consumed fish in a week of 1985, and which rose by 100 grams within 5 years before it dropped to 600 grams per fish consumed by Chinese in the week of 1995. After that, the fish consumption continuously rose to reach at its peak of 850 grams per week.
In contrast, salt began at 500 grams of consumption in the week of 1985, after that it dipped substantially for the next 15 years, at 400 grams in the week of 1995. By 2010, the declining trend of salt consumption persistent to end at 200 grams per salt per week.
On the other hand, if we look at meat consumption, which started at the lowest point of 100 grams per person per week in the first year. After that this slowly rose to finish at 200 grams per meat per week of the year of 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Fossil fuels are used in many countries. Other countries use alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar power, which is encouraged. To what extent is this positive or negative development? 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The table below describes percentages of homeschooled students in Some Country in 1999-2004. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (C02) emissions per person in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... per person per week in the first year. After that this slowly rose to finish at 200 ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255707762557 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.0958904109589 0.116061578633 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0456621004566 0.0759168565197 60% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0182648401826 0.0366838410393 50% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0228310502283 0.0131127313244 174% => OK
Prepositions: 0.246575342466 0.155750635184 158% => OK
Participles: 0.027397260274 0.0379272487307 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57987887313 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027397260274 0.0210936926555 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0958904109589 0.0948980150116 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00913242009132 0.00967000014798 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1097.0 1161.00487805 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.9 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.485 5.90752243213 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.215 0.337110787985 64% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.155 0.247514529752 63% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.12 0.171178102325 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.09 0.112407865282 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57987887313 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.546246751206 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.7709213854 49.3433353143 81% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9669486801 42.9750493124 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 135.714022679 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.0094962315 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.689975730869 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 40.5 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 3.86666666667 2.94281807926 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324751099168 0.418131533498 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.216045845684 0.181151798455 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0670870232071 0.0850326197045 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.84560735167 0.706616315825 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118042152995 0.157042692854 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197113587939 0.228904883108 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982528692432 0.108899403657 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.35955496334 0.367819155151 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.176276382579 0.0812612215331 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248219388204 0.316326947829 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824935940902 0.0921553760075 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.