The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 19821 to 2007.
The graph illustrates the use of three different spreads(margarine, low fat and reduced spreads and butter) over the time period of 1981 to 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, both margarine and butter consumption reduced from 1981 to 2007 whereas low fat and reduced spreads were consumed more in 2007 as compared to 1996. A notable fall in the consumption of butter can be seen over given period. While the consumption of butter was highest in 1981, in 2007 low fat and reduced spreads were the most consumed spreads.
In terms of low fat and reduced spreads, they were not consumed till 1996, however, during the period of 1996 to 2001 their consumption increased from 10 grams to a peak of above 80 grams followed by a fall to about 70 grams in 2007.
Interestingly, butter consumption was above 140 grams which rose over the course of another 5 years to about 160 grams at its peak followed by a significant decrease till 2007 to only 50 grams. On the other hand, the use of margarine remained between 80 to 100 grams from 1981 to 2001 later falling to 40 grams in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 78
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with the large supermarkets in the area How does this effect local communities How could this situation be improved 84
- The diagram below shows how coal is used to produce electricity 73
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in 6 countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62886597938 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59423316241 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.166435826 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220162159026 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108097644617 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663176727503 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142140816016 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492810886528 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.