The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Jane1202 on Sat, 03/30/2019 - 10:41

The line graphs below shows data about the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, fish was the least commonly used food in the European country throughout the period show. The consumption of chicken rose dramatically, whereas that of beef, lamb and fish decreased.
In the year 1979, beef which was consumed was about 220 grams per person per week. The figured for chicken and lamb were lower, at about 140 grams and 150 grams respectively. The figure for fish was lowest, at about 60 grams.
The period from 1979 to 2004 saw a dramatic increase in the consumption of chicken approximately 250 grams. By contrast, about 60 grams of lamb was consumed, compared to 40 grams of fish in 2004. In the year 2004, the consumption of beef reach the highest point, at 230 grams, however, this fell quickly by 110 grams.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-12-22 Lovepreet123 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-09 anasrafiq 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Jane1202 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r fish was lowest, at about 60 grams. The period from 1979 to 2004 saw a dramatic...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74675324675 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51056966185 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8472505339 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.2222222222 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231172084226 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113310047159 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155521546357 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20628836398 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197583920828 0.0819641961636 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.