The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares 3 sources that polluted the air in the UK between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that the total amount of air pollutants in the UK decreased significantly over the years. The emissions from the industry made up the highest rate in all years.
In 1990, the total amount of air pollutants reached a peak at 7 million tonnes. This figure witnessed a rapid decline to 4 million tonnes in 1999 before it continued to drop with a slower speech, at over 3 million tonnes in 2005.
It is clear that the air pollution was caused mostly by industrial activities. In 1990, the number of emissions from this sector was 5.5 million tonnes, and then decreased sharply to 3 million tonnes in 1996, followed by a slight fall to 2 million tonnes in 2005. For the transport and households, the figure of all was nearly 1 million tonnes in the first year of the period. This data for the transport stayed constant over the years, at 1 million tonnes in 2005. However, it reported a downtrend for households with the levels of pollutants appropriately zero at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-12 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 76 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | dnnghha | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-11 | Khakimova KhA | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | Thang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | Tran Ngoc Anh | 70 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
- Some people think that the world should have one government rather than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62564102564 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60369433586 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9359691183 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157986745495 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799815369434 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719840607763 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133525234434 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789703338355 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.