The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The line graph compares three sources of air pollutants in the UK over the period 15 years.
Overall, there was a gradually decline in totally by the time. But especially that the industry decreased significantly.
In the year 1990, the amount of air pollution in transport were the same as that households under million tonne. While the amount of air pollution in the industry were higher than that five times. Over next six years, they saw a enormous drop in industry around 2.5 million tonnes. By contrast, the polluting air in transport provided a negligible amount while the households declined minimally.
From 1996 to 2005, the air pollutants in industry and households fell continuously respective 3 and a half million tonnes. Furthermore, the trend was predicted decrease steadily. Also, the amount of air pollutants in transport went fluctuated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | prathamesh27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 56
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and a plan for changes to the school site in 2024 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...he period 15 years. Overall, there was a gradually decline in totally by the time. But especially ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as that households under million tonne. While the amount of air pollution in the indu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ve times. Over next six years, they saw a enormous drop in industry around 2.5 mi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22463768116 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.894861783 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6052960159 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.1 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261313034996 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973690879453 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931937445006 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156115767689 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102715507576 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.