The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart given compares four distinct nations in terms of how many hours that a teacher at 3 levels of education allocated for the teaching purpose in 2010.
It is clear from the chart that high school teachers in four countries were prone to spare more time for educating. Additionally, the quantities of the USA took the highest figures in the chart over time.
Regarding primary education , the number of teaching hours spent by an US teacher was highest, at approximately 870, while those of Ireland, Spain and Japan shared a comparable figure, at exactly 600. About Lower Secondary, a teacher in the USA spent around 1100 hours on educating, compared to 800 and 600 hours allocated by Irlish and Janpanese ones in turn. Likewise, the quantity of Japan was dwarfed by that of Ireland, at exactly 600.
In terms of junior high education, there were above 1100 hours spared by an US teacher, while the number of Spain was slightly lower, at 1000. Conversely, an Irlish teachers tended to allocate nearly 800 hours per year to educate. Meanwhile standing at over 600, the figure for Japan was about twice as low as that of the USA.
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 73
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... over time. Regarding primary education , the number of teaching hours spent by a...
^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., the number of teaching hours spent by an US teacher was highest, at approximatel...
^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., there were above 1100 hours spared by an US teacher, while the number of Spain w...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...e nearly 800 hours per year to educate. Meanwhile standing at over 600, the figure for Ja...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, likewise, regarding, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76767676768 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50577978885 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.853744964 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120916571758 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565610128121 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463065418638 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818072603308 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155686237588 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.