The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

Write at least 150 words.

The bar graph illustrates us the expenditure on various recreational facilities all over the world from 1995 to 2000. The significant change we can see between the USA and Asia in comparison with Europe.

It is obviously here that in 2000 was spent the greatest amount of money in all the regions. The USA expended over $250 billion, Europe more than $150 and finally the quantity for Asia was over $100. In 1995 in the USA it was spent over $150 billion, what absolutely differed to Europe, in which that spending was below $150 billion, and the lowest percentage was shown in Asia which total spending result was over $100 billion.

Furthermore, from this bar graph it is clearly seen that in all of the regions people spent more money on publishing and television. The sum of expenditure on cinema and music was approximately equal.

Thus, as far as the spending number was different in the USA, Europe and Asia, it is concerned that during the five-year period expenses on all the shown amusement activities were rapidly increased.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-05-17 chinnusalas 73 view
Essays by user chinnusalas :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...is bar graph it is clearly seen that in all of the regions people spent more money on publ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80337078652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66330651934 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8505966697 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196763207001 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790461106713 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047869854656 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105581857405 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509461606055 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.