The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the quantity of ways enquiries made in the Tourist Information Office in one city from January to June in the year 2011.
Overall, the number of enquiries in person and by telephone experienced an upward trend, whilst that of by letter or email fell. Furthermore, if enquiries in person in the first month were the least used ones, by the end of the given period they were applied the most.
To start with, being at over 400 the figure of in-person enquiries started to rise to reach around 1900 in the last month. By-telephone enquiries were at the highest usage and in-person ones surpassed them in March. After a month of stability the figures climbed and up to 1600.
On the other hand the quantity of enquiries by letter or email in Junuary was roughly 800. Slightly decreasing, in February it became the least applied way of surveys. Lastly, dropping to under 400 May , it remained unchanged until June.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
Essays by user Fedya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rveys. Lastly, dropping to under 400 May , it remained unchanged until June.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74233128834 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49862395205 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4698004032 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186160140746 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663929009437 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750586659888 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116374378492 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909692115066 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.