The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The graph illustrates number of questions taken by the tourist information office in a city over a six-month period in 2011.
Overall, the greatest amount of inquiries from tourists were received in person while the least amount of question was taken by letter or email.
In January, only around 410 inquiries received in person. However then, in person conversations showed gradual upward trend and reached 800 inquiries by march. After that figures for in person inquiries rocketed up and start increasing about 600 inquiries every passing month then peaked at just above 2000 by June. When it comes the questions were taken by telephone, first fluctuated around 1000 and 800 between January and march then levelled off for a month. However, after that, it showed a significant rise and reached its peak which is 1600.
When it comes by letter/email questions, it became the least preferred communication way at the end of the period, starting with 800 inquiries and dipped at just above 400 by june.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 79
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 68
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 78
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18072289157 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63194418778 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.947331922 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205477998718 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107134993493 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181044490338 0.0843802449381 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184118347151 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2320349952 0.0819641961636 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.