The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The graph illustrates the volume of enquiries which the Tourist Information Office received in particular city over a span of six month in 2011.
From the overall perspective, it is apparent that there were two upward trends and one downward. Enquiries received in person and by telephone had been raised over the all given period, while the letters’ and email’s enquiries had been declined from January till June.
Going into details, in person enquiries showed the most sharp rise, on early it started from the approximately 450 and ended with about 1900. The next rising trends with phone enquiries began with little less than 900 and finished at the final point with 1600. letters and emails enquiries at the beginning of the year marked with less than 800 but by the end of the year the amount dropped to less than 400.
In addition to facts above, the upwards trends had almost the same slightly rising. However, it is needed to highlight that in March all three types of enquiries had not so big gap in numbers with having 700, 800 and 1000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The bar below illustrates how three countries deal with dangerous waste products 67
- The charts show the distribution of money spent on music in three different years in Northern Ireland 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...d in particular city over a span of six month in 2011. From the overall perspective,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Letters
... finished at the final point with 1600. letters and emails enquiries at the beginning o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78142076503 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34393746078 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8466784375 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261938912334 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11059662881 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161848956032 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191637339347 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196767218097 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.