The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates how many shop closed, and how many other shops opened in one country between 2011 and 2018. Overall, it can be seen that the number of shops that had closed had decreased over the years. Likewise, the new opened shops’ number fell down over the years.
To begin with, in 2011, 8500 new places were opened to customers while 6500 shops experienced a clouser. In 2012, the number of new shops declined almost to the half, and only 500 places decided to close. From 2012 to 2014, the number of new shops jumped higher once again until it reached 6100 in 2014 whereas closed shops’ number was fluctuated over this period and stabled again at approximately 6500 in 2014.
Moreover, in 2015, the numbers of both new opened and closed shops have dramatically declined and reached 4000 and 800 shops respectively. From 2016 to 2018, the number of shop openings increased a few in 2017 before it experienced a decrease in 2018 to reach 3000 shops only. In contrast, the number of shops closures declined in 2017 before it increased to 5100 in 2018.
- The diagram below shows the process of how for recycling plastic bottles 61
- In the future nobody wiil buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 73
- The graph below compares the weekly wages by age and gender in the united states in 2015 90
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'few ins'.
Suggestion: few ins
...the number of shop openings increased a few in 2017 before it experienced a decrease i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73015873016 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35543052669 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6468659391 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408178554346 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198150981787 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388572958416 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296432222448 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306123695984 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.