the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasion where relevant

Essay topics:

the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparasion where relevant.

The line graph is given to demonstrate tourist-visits figures in special Caribbean island during 7 years period from 2010-2017. Features were given in millions and were measured in three types such as using cruise ships or island to stay and total.
Initial points of attributes were 0.25, 0.5 and 1 millions in visitors staying on cruise ships, island and total respectively. Then, the indicators of total and cruise users showed slight improvement and reached to 1.25 and 0.5 each while amount of on island users remained until 2011. Passing 2 years the quantity of island users rose sharply and achieved 1.5 when numbers of visitors on island users could return to its previous result 0.5 million visitors in 2013, coming back to 2011 year’s amount in 2012. However, this trend showed stable amelioration after colliding with some fluctuations and achieved its peak 2 millions of on cruise users in 2017. Total user’s indicator illustrated positive tendency until the end of survey (3.5 million users) with one-year stability from 2015 to 2017 while on island users finished research almost stable amount of visitors (1.5 million of visitors) with a drop to 1.25 in 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-14 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user Radioactive- :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...some fluctuations and achieved its peak 2 millions of on cruise users in 2017. Total user’s i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10880829016 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54358236944 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9634879664 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125928423585 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734297026499 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065639972619 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130366165663 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605031486358 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.