the graph below shows the number of university graduates in canada from 1992 to 2007
The line graph illustrates the proprtion of adult male and female graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
It is immedialtely obvious that majorti of females graduated throughout this peiod. Meanwhile, the numbers both male and female graduates rose in the end of 2007.
In 1992, approximately 70,000 male gradutated and on the other hand, it is apparent that 98,000 of females were graduated. The quantity of male graduates increased up to 78,000 by 1995 and waxed and wained up to 73,000 in the end of 2001. Moreover, it is evident that the amount of female graduates climb ed up to 105,000 and witnessed a reverse trend up to 100,000 by 1998. Suprisingly, the male graduates had a significat growth from 2001 to 2006 and ended up peekin 98,000. Furthermore, the numbers of female graduates witnessd a dramatical growth from 1999 to 2007 and eventually provided 148,000 graduates, respectively.
However, it is crystal clear that the shape of the both figures were approximately equal from the beginning up to 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 92 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | thucuc | 55 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | eyraen | view | |
| 2022-01-26 | anhphan2511 | view |
- Today s parents spend too little time staying with their children and use television to make their children keep quiet explain the reason and results by using your relevant examples 76
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations others however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The table shows results of surveys done in in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage 73
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 64
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87360015567 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5096877399 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241123270672 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125374491823 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10664141494 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191792689284 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111651701443 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.