The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
The line chart gives information about the number of students pursued degrees in Canada over 15 years period starting from 1992.
Overall, it is observed the most number number of women graduated as compared to men during the entire course of time. Even-though there is a slight fluctuation in numbers between years the numbers are increased rapidly for both men and women. During first four years the increasing trend is similar for both except there is some differences in numbers between them.
Firstly, with regards to the female graduates it began at around 99,000 and then it started falling from 1995 reaches exactly 100,000 in 1997 before increasing dramatically to 128,000 in 2004, from then on it is steadily increasing and it reaches the most significant value of 148,000 in 2006 and its expected to reach 150,000 in coming years. Overall there is an 50% increase in graduates in 2006 compared to the starting year.
Likewise approximately 71,00 male degree holders in Canadian universities in 1992 climbed up-to 76,000 in 1995 and then it slumped down to its initial value of 71,00 in 1998. Between 1998 and 2002 there is a slight fluctuation in numbers (between 71,000 and 73,000). During the year 2002 it started to went up and hits a high of nearly 93,000 in around 2006.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-02 | quynhttyb1 | 100 | view |
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location. 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 78
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 81
- The chart shows the amount of fast foods consumption in Melbourne over period of time. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
...om 1992. Overall, it is observed the most number number of women graduated as compared t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: number
...92. Overall, it is observed the most number number of women graduated as compared to men d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some differences'?
Suggestion: there are some differences
...easing trend is similar for both except there is some differences in numbers between them. Firstly, wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
... 2006 compared to the starting year. Likewise approximately 71,00 male degree holders...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, likewise, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95412844037 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5222851538 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7864120203 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166430973051 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757126387999 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528166131502 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110180314622 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494721837296 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.